Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by the National Farmers' Union

  1.  The National Farmers' Union (NFU) represents approximately 55,000 farmers and growers in England and Wales. European policies and most notably the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) shape the environment within which our members operate. As such, EU developments are of the utmost interest for our organisation.

  2.  The EU Reform Treaty signed in Lisbon in December 2007 amends some of the existing framework within which EU policies are proposed, adopted and implemented while confirming and reinforcing other aspects of the institutional and policy set-up. The ultimate objective of the Reform Treaty is to make an EU of (at least) 27 members work more effectively—an objective that becomes particularly relevant in an area, like agriculture, given the ongoing process of policy reform and recent market developments and structural changes.

  3.  It is important to highlight that, despite the many changes embedded in the Reform Treaty, both the objectives of the CAP and the rationale for a common agricultural policy remain unchanged. The objectives of the CAP, laid down in Article 33 (ex Article 39), have not been modified and remain:

    (a)  To increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilization of the factors of production, in particular labour.

    (b)  Thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community ....

    (c)  To stabilise markets.

    (d)  To ensure availability of supplies.

    (e)  To ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices.

  The NFU believes that these objectives are neither irrelevant nor mistaken and especially once other article provisions (such as the incorporation of environmental protection into all European policies, via the Single European Act, 1987 in Article 174 (ex 130(r)) are taken into consideration.[1] It is the NFU's belief that these objectives are particularly relevant given tighter agricultural markets (as a result of demographic pressures and supply constraints) and expected increased market volatility.

  4.  Similarly, the Reform Treaty confirms (see Article 32 (ex 38) of the Treaty) the very reason for the existence of a common agricultural policy: The common market shall extend to agriculture and trade in agricultural products. In the 1950s agriculture was subsidised in all countries of Western Europe (including of course the UK) but by different methods and to differing degrees. In order to allow free trade within the common market without distortion, there had to be a common policy. This justification remains to this day.

  5.  Moreover, since environmental protection became a European issue, it can be argued that there is a further need to ensure that the environmental constraints on agriculture (most notably through cross-compliance requirements) are also broadly equal throughout Europe, in order to avoid competitive distortions.

  6.  The Reform Treaty further strengthens the role of the European Parliament in farm policy by increasing the role of the European Parliament in the design of agricultural policy (through the extension of the co-decision procedure beyond agricultural issues related to human health or the environment) and in its budgetary procedure (where in addition to approval by the EU Council, assent from the European Parliament will also be required in order to adopt the EU agricultural budget). The NFU welcomes the extent to which these measures address the criticisms of "democratic deficit" levied against the European Union. However, the increased role of the European Parliament can also have other less positive and/or unpredictable results. In this respect, it should be noted that the increased role of the European Parliament is expected to result in a longer decision-making process and that its effect on the content of policies is more difficult to ascertain—while some claim that a legislative voice for agriculture would potentially tailor Parliament's dossiers to suit more closely the needs of farmers, others believe that another set of opinions into the melting pot of the decision-making process will water down action and increase political compromises.

  7.  The NFU believes that the additional stability provided by a permanent President of the European Council will provide the continuity to the policy agenda necessary to tackle some of the challenges facing the EU in the years ahead, including CAP reform, globalisation and climate change.

  8.  The new "double qualified majority voting', to apply from 2014 to agricultural policy, will take better account of population, a move that will give more clout to countries such as Germany and the UK. Although this alteration to the balance of power within the Council might result in a more pro-active policy agenda, when analysed in conjunction with the increased role of the European Parliament highlighted above, the results are less certain. The NFU believes that the new system is simpler than the "triple majority" voting system of the Nice Treaty, fairer and more transparent.

  9.  The Reform Treaty gives national parliaments a voice in making European laws for the first time and result in the review (if one third of the national parliaments considers the proposal in break of the subsidiarity principle) or rejection of the proposals (if a majority of national parliaments object). This provision is expected to have a clear impact on all areas of joint competence with relevance for the farming sector (including environmental policy, energy policy or competition policy), ensuring that the Community only acts in areas where it adds value.

  10.  Article 136a (and the associated amendments to Articles 138 and 139) are intended to enhance labour negotiations in the framework of tripartite dialogues (involving employer delegates, employee representatives and government or government appointed representatives). Although welcoming the principle, the NFU believes that the impact on labour relations in the agricultural sector (and most notably on the operation of the Agricultural Wages Board) is, especially in light of the UK-specific protocol, at most, marginal.

  11.  By introducing the possibility of citizens" initiatives, the Reform Treaty further reinforces the link between EU citizens and the policy-making process. Given that any policy proposal initiated by a citizens" initiative will be subject to the same internal debate and scrutiny as any initiative by the EU Commission, the move is welcomed by the NFU.

  12.  The Reform Treaty reduces the size of the Commission after 2014, limiting the number of Commissioners to 2/3 of member states. Assuming that the position of Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development remains unchanged, the NFU believes that a reduction in the number of Commissioners can contribute to the coherency of policies.

December 2007




1   The Amsterdam Treaty (1997) reaffirmed the EU commitment to sustainable development and to high levels of environmental protection-the environment must be integrated into the definition and the implementation of all the Union's other economic and social policies, with a view to promoting sustainable development. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008