Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by Ms Sally DeBono

  1.  The creation of a full-time, unelected EU President, who will negotiate directly with the European Commission on new EU laws, further removes elected national governments from EU decision-making and erodes their ability to stop legislation that voters do not want.

  2.  The creation of an EU Foreign Minister with supporting diplomatic service, will extend the EU's control over foreign policy. Article III-300 states that the EU Foreign Minister will be able to initiate common positions that can be imposed on individual member countries by a majority vote. Once agreed, the Foreign Minister will present the common EU position on the United Nations Security Council (Article lll-305). The EU diplomatic service aims to make national embassies redundant, leaving Britain un-represented across the world.

  3.  The Treaty will extend majority voting in EU decision-making and cut our voting strength by 30%, so greatly reducing Britain's influence over new EU laws. 69 national vetoes will be scrapped, meaning our government can be increasingly out-voted by other countries and EU laws in more policy areas imposed on Britain regardless. For example, Article 111-147 of the original Constitution said that the EU can impose privatisation in any area of service provision, without the consent of elected national parliaments.

  4.  The Treaty will give the Union a legal personality to make legal agreements in its own right and represent its members on international bodies, cutting Britain's influence in the world. Brussels would be able to agree international treaties with external countries that would be legally binding on Britain and other EU member states.

  5.  The Treaty will extend the EU's powers over criminal justice, through the power to set common definitions of criminal offences (Article 111-271) and harmonise national laws through the mutual recognition of judicial decisions (Article I-42). The establishment of an EU Public Prosecutor will be made possible (Article III-274). Eurojust will be given new powers including the "initiation of criminal investigations" (Article III-273) and the EU's embryonic police force Europol will be expanded. Its officers will retain their immunity from criminal prosecution if they break national laws (Article III-276).

  6.  Article IV-444 will allow the EU to remove national vetoes in almost all remaining policy areas, and Article IV-445 will allow sections of the treaty relating to the "internal policies and action of the Union" to be re-written. This will allow the EU to self-amend the treaty in future, preventing major British scrutiny and debate about the EU's powers and direction.

  7.  The application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights to FSJ measures: My opinion is that the Government's Redlines and opt-in/out will not hold. While Art 4 of the Reform Treaty, paragraph 2, states that "national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State", through the Elf's Protection of Critical Infrastructure, the EU, using Article 308 may for the very first time in the history of this Country, allow others—the EU—to involve itself in the very sensitive issue of National Security, again, allegedly because this is yet another matter that transcends National Borders. If our National Security is transferred to the EU, it is one of the greatest betrayals of all, because, in war time, any information given to the "enemy", is a matter of treason.

  In conclusion, I do not see how any Government, whose first loyalty and solemn Oath of Allegiance is to the Crown and this Country, could "ask" (which they are not doing) the people to destroy their own Constitution. Furthermore, I cannot understand how any Government could accept and ratify such a constitutional treaty, which, when fully implemented with the inclusion and use of a self amending Article, would destroy everything that the people (including my father, who was a World War 2 Bomber pilot) fought for. (Freedom and Liberty)

  I submit this to the House of Lords, who is the only remaining democratic hope that we, the people of Britain, have.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008