Select Committee on Intergovernmental Organisations Minutes of Evidence


Annex A

Additional information relating to Q5

  The Global Fund has revolutionized access to treatment for those with HIV/AIDS, but there has not been a concomitant increase in prevention efforts. There is already a large investment in HIV vaccine development, but increasing pessimism about the likelihood of an effective vaccine.1 Greater emphasis should therefore be put on other forms of prevention of HIV infection.

  There is convincing evidence that other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) enhance the transmission of HIV during sexual intercourse by enhancing both the vulnerability of HIV uninfected persons and the infectiousness of HIV infected persons. The most common STI in sub-Saharan Africa is Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection. HSV-2 prevalence rises steeply with age, reaching rates of more than 70% in women and 60% in men in some populations.2 People infected with HSV-2 have a three-fold higher risk of acquiring HIV. This effect is highest following recent HSV-2 infection and is therefore most important in young people, the group with the highest incidence of HIV. It has been estimated that 20-50% of HIV infections may be attributable to HSV-2,2 depending on the prevalence of HSV-2 infection. An intervention that could reverse this would have a significant impact.

  Treatment of herpes with antiviral drugs shows potential in reducing the infectiousness of HIV (as well as HSV-2),3 but long-term suppressive therapy is not possible at a population level. For a feasible and effective population approach, a vaccine against HSV-2 is needed.

  No vaccine is yet available, for both technical and commercial reasons. Bringing prophylactic vaccines to the market is a long and costly exercise with uncertain returns. None of the major global vaccine players (Merck, GSK, Wyeth, Sanofi-Aventis, Chiron and Baxter) is currently focusing significant vaccine development efforts on HSV. GSK is collaborating with the NIH/NIAID on a recombinant gD protein vaccine that has shown some efficacy, but only in women and only in those who are not infected with HSV-1:4 infection with HSV-1 is almost universal in Africa.

  The most promising vaccine candidate has been developed by a British biotechnology company. This is highly effective in pre-clinical studies and safe in early clinical studies, but due to change of ownership of the company has been stuck at this stage of development. Targeted action is needed to further the development of products such as this that are potentially of major public health importance but are languishing because of the investment needed and the uncertainty of commercial returns.

REFERENCES

1  Steinbrook R. One step forward, two steps back—will there ever be an AIDS vaccine? N Engl J Med 2007;357:2653-5.

2  Freeman E E, Weiss H A, Glynn J R, Cross P L, Whitworth J A, Hayes R J. Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. AIDS 2006;20:73-83.

3  Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Foulongne V, et al. Reduction of HIV-1 RNA levels with therapy to suppress herpes simplex virus. N Engl J Med 2007;356(8):790-9.

4  Stanberry L R, Spruance S L, Cunningham A L, et al. Glycoprotein-D-adjuvant vaccine to prevent genital herpes. N Engl J Med 2002;347(21):1652-61.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008