Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by Divine Chocolate Ltd, Kuapa Kokoo, Trading Visions and Comic Relief

  Having previously submitted written and oral evidence, we would like to offer some follow-up comments and recommendations, in response to issues raised at the evidence sessions and highlighting our key recommendations.

  In the light of the considerable and suitable benefits that Fairtrade has delivered for millions of the poorest producers in the world it is entirely appropriate that DFID continues to support the growth of Fairtrade in the UK. The evidence to date has shown that that support has been very effective in the following areas:

    —  Supporting a start up company, Divine Chocolate, with a loan guarantee thus enabling cocoa farmers in Ghana to own a significant proportion of a very successful company.

    —  Raising awareness among the British population, including children, students, teachers and consumers of all ages, creating a popular movement for development issues and a growing consumer market for the Fairtrade.

    —  Supporting the development of standards for Fairtrade supply chains.

    —  Supporting the establishment of new suppliers and commodities.

  We would particularly like to offer a response to the important question posed by the committee of whether industry should invest in the Fairtrade supply chains. Clearly they should, as Fairtrade has the double benefit of offering a successful marketing strategy and reassurance that supply chains are sustainable and decent. We would also strongly suggest however that any standards developed belong to the whole Fairtrade movement, including producer groups, and not just to the specific outlets who engage in developing them. Matching industry investment in developing standards would be an effective mechanism for DFID to make sure that the outputs are accessible to others, so other suppliers can use these supply chains. Supply chains developed through such partnerships would be more open, transparent and accountable. To ensure this they should be developed in full consultation with the relevant producers. Ownership of the certification system and supply chains must also extend to producers, ensuring that meaningful, long term participation by producers is secured.

  Considering our own experience of where DFID's support has been most beneficial, we would like to suggest that in future, DFID has a particular role to play in:

    —  Building new markets.

    —  Keeping producer impact and participation at centre of Fairtrade.

BUILDING NEW MARKETS

  Our previous evidence outlines in detail how a loan guarantee from DFID enabled Divine to embark on a unique farmer owned Fairtrade proposition and build the market for a successful mainstream chocolate brand in the UK, with ongoing education and public awareness raising also support by DFID Development Awareness funding. Both these types of investments have undoubtedly represented incredibly good value for money for DFID. Their outputs have contributed not only to a new market for Fairtrade chocolate but built the market for Fairtrade generally among the UK population. We would suggest the UK government and DFID should work with private sector partners to encourage and enable them to build new markets, engaging them to making a long term commitment to work in partnership with producers and educate their customers about the impact of Fairtrade.

  Securing this long term commitment to sustained involvement in Fairtrade by businesses will require embedding it more deeply into operational practice. At present there is a disconnect. Supermarket buyers, for example, are only assessed on their financial performance. In out experience this makes achieving initial listings particularly difficult. It also arguably makes it difficult for them to pursue Fairtrade strategies which don't achieve immediate commercial success, within their standard operational terms. DFID could play a role, in their engagement with big business, retail and manufacturing, in suggesting that corporate responsibility extends to the operational practises of the institution and doesn't just remain as a public stated corporate objective, squeezed out by other internal pressures focussed on short term success.

KEEPING PRODUCER IMPACT AT THE HEART OF FAIRTRADE

  DFID has a particular role to play in this and should support business models, certification systems and awareness raising activities which prioritise this concern:

    —  Pioneering business models: The Divine-Kuapa partnership shows what extraordinary impact is possible. Such genuine partnerships make Fairtrade more sustainable, adding huge value to the brand and ensuring Fairtrade becomes part of the culture and operational practices of an organisation.

    —  Certification systems and supply chain development: As we have outlined above, it is crucial that producer participation and ownership is a key priority here. This is important, not only from the point of view of developing relevant systems which deliver real impact on the ground but also from the point of view of creating platforms and forums for third world stakeholders, to participate in broader discussions about international trade and development.

    —  Public awareness raising: As outlined in our previous evidence, our education work has brought cocoa farmer perspectives to the UK public in a highly accessible and engaging way. We would urge continued significant investment in this kind of work, which not only informs the public about Fairtrade and the part they can play, but brings about the kind of climate which makes initiatives like Make Poverty History possible. We would encourage DFID to continue funding a diverse range of organisations in order to reach a broad range of audiences and ensure resources and efforts are maximised through the networks.

  Finally, we would like to reiterate the following points to the committee:

    —  The importance of continuing to invest in in-country infrastructure and capacity building. in order that producer organisations can achieve maximum benefit from the growing opportunity offered by Fairtrade and have meaningful participation and ownership in it's development.

    —  The importance of continuing to maximise the opportunity of consumer awareness of the Fairtrade Mark. Through a diverse range of stakeholders DFID has a key role to play in supporting public awareness and understanding of Fairtrade, which is a critical gateway to greater understanding of the developing world and a powerful catalyst for changing attitudes and actions.

    —  The importance of engaging with industry initiatives, such as the ICI (International Cocoa Initiative), which seek to tackle the challenges faced by third world producers. DFID have a key role to play here, in calling industry to account and opening such initiatives to external and expert scrutiny.

  Finally we would welcome continued consultation. We have greatly valued the opportunity to participate in this inquiry and offer our own experience of DFID's invaluable support. It has been particularly pleasing to participate alongside our partners, Kuapa Kokoo. Their participation in the inquiry and in other national and intenrational arenas has been possible because of a unique, ground-breaking, private sector initiative, with the interests and future of cocoa farmers at its heart. We hope the UK government and DFID will continue to support such pioneering models, prioritising producer participation and ownership.

April 2007







 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 June 2007