Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examiation of Witnesses (Questions 128-139)

MR RICHARD LONGSON AND MR KIERAN GORDON

1 APRIL 2008


  Q128 Chairman: Thank you very much for coming to give evidence. Would you like to introduce yourselves and say what you do?

  Mr Longson: I am Richard Longson, this year's present of the Institute of Career Guidance. My day job is head of careers at Leicester Grammar School. I am a qualified teacher and career guidance practitioner.

  Mr Gordon: I am Kieran Gordon, immediate past president of the institute. My day job is that of chief executive of Connexions Greater Merseyside providing information, advice and guidance to young people.

  Q129  Chairman: One of the influences on people in deciding whether to join the Armed Forces is the views of their families, friends and the people who have come to be described as gate-keepers. Do you think that enough is being done by the Ministry of Defence to influence these gate-keepers or explain what life in the Armed Forces is like so there is a realistic appreciation of that service?

  Mr Longson: Sometimes it would be quite difficult to reach gate-keepers. There is information on the television. There are gate-keepers for parents, for instance. Parents then come to it once young people have perhaps made a decision to find out more about the Armed Services, and then it is further down the line before the point where they say that they want to join. It then becomes more of an urgent need to find out about it. Parents have come to me and asked. There have been situations where our Armed Services liaison officers have been prepared to give parents a ring and speak to them. In a sense, at that point there is support. As to the world of education where teachers are also gate-keepers, a lot more visits used to be offered by the MoD for people to go on things. They are still there. As head of careers I have been offered a visit to, say, Sandhurst to see how that works. I have also been to the Admiralty Interview Board in the past. There is support there.

  Q130  Chairman: You say there used to be a lot more visits.

  Mr Gordon: Yes. It was quite common for the Armed Forces to arrange a regular carousel of visits for teachers and advisers to spend some time with and get beneath the skin of what it was like to go through a recruitment exercise and the various trades and occupations that the Armed Forces provided. There seem to be fewer of those than there were.

  Q131  Chairman: Why?

  Mr Gordon: I do not know.

  Q132  Chairman: When did they reduce?

  Mr Gordon: I would say it has been perceptible over the past 10 years. I cannot quantify it for you; it is just my experience. I have been in the careers advice business since 1980. In my early years as an adviser there were regular trips and experiences to be had and there seem to be fewer now than there were then. There are some upsides to it; there are now more opportunities for young people themselves to get direct experience. Work experience and enterprise programmes are now run for young people and they were not so common years ago.

  Mr Longson: Certainly in terms of local RAF bases there has been a greater number of people going out on work experience and a greater awareness and perception of how schools operate, whereas before there was less understanding.

  Q133  Chairman: Your memorandum suggests that there is still quite a lot of interest in joining the Armed Forces. Would you say that was true nationally? Are there regional variations? How would you characterise that interest?

  Mr Longson: I do not believe there is a set picture and it is really across the piece. I do not believe that compared with past years there has been a perceptible change.

  Q134  Chairman: You spoke about visits to military establishments by teachers and career guidance people. What about visits to schools by the Armed Forces themselves? Are they as regular as they used to be or have they tailed off?

  Mr Gordon: My experience is that they are still as regular as they used to be. Each of the three Services comes to the careers evenings and conventions run by a number of schools in my patch. The Armed Forces also become involved in interviewing enterprise projects in schools with a classroom-based approach. I do not detect any perceptible change in that. Of the forces, the Army seems to me to be the most active and proactive in that respect.

  Q135  Chairman: From your experience would you describe them as worthwhile visits?

  Mr Gordon: The visits by the Army to the schools?

  Q136  Chairman: Yes.

  Mr Gordon: Yes, I would.

  Q137  Mr Hamilton: Is that also true of the visits to schools in Scotland?

  Mr Gordon: I would be surprised if it was not, but I am not sure.

  Q138  Chairman: Does not your institute cover Scotland?

  Mr Gordon: It does.

  Q139  Chairman: It would be helpful if you would let us know of your experience of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in that respect. Often in our inquiries we find there is a variation between different areas of the country. You say these visits are worthwhile. How do visits by the Armed Forces to schools compare in terms of quality with visits by other prospective employers?

  Mr Longson: The quality of the people who come in is high; it is a quality service. They fall into two categories. There are visits about the Armed Services themselves, but there are also skills development-type visits where the Armed Services provide almost a service to support young people. Obviously, the spin-off is to see the Armed Services as part of the community which is very important and to develop the skills of young people so that they become more aware indirectly as opposed to direct adverts almost.

  Mr Gordon: It is obviously very important that the Armed Forces have the personnel, training and resources to be able to present themselves very well in or out of the school environment which individual employers do not necessarily always have. Maybe some larger private and public sector employers can do that. Usually, you find that professional bodies and institutes or technicians compete on a reasonably level playing field, but the majority of employers cannot deploy the personnel, resource and expertise that very often the Armed Forces provide.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 30 July 2008