Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 580 - 599)

  580. MS LIEVEN: We will look into that, my Lord. It may be in the equality impact assessment. We will look into it and if we cannot deal with it today we will put it down on our shopping list.

  581. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: My next question would be, then, if we have not any plans to try to put that right in the future when would the real squeeze point come when they would need to be put in?

  582. MS LIEVEN: I think I should explain the 93 per cent. It is 93 per cent of journeys if people go to their nearest station and then travel to another Crossrail station. So, self-evidently, if you do not go to your nearest station—say you live right next to Maryland and you travel to Stratford—then you could say 100 per cent of journeys can be step-free. The 93 per cent is based on going to your closest station. It is also appropriate that I explain that it is assuming you go from a Crossrail station to your Crossrail destination. If, for example, you are going from Stratford to Goodge Street—so you go from Stratford to Tottenham Court Road on Crossrail—that counts as a step-free journey. The fact that, actually, your ultimate destination is Goodge Street on the Northern Line and that is not fully accessible is not taken into account in the 93 per cent. I think it is important that the Committee understand what that 93 per cent actually means. We will look into the question of the degree to which we have taken into account the likely growth of disabilities in the community with the ageing population.

  583. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Ms Lieven. Tell me this: how are you going to deal with this point as it is raised this afternoon by Newham? For instance, is Dr Maynard still going to be here, because she may be very relevant to some of the points they want to make?

  584. MS LIEVEN: I hope that Dr Maynard could stay, and then if there are points that the Committee or, indeed, Mr Reed want to recall her on, I am sure we could do that.

  585. CHAIRMAN: The only thing is I do not want her to disappear just at the point we are going to be dealing this afternoon with these very issues.

  586. MS LIEVEN: No. I will discuss the matter with Dr Maynard.

  587. CHAIRMAN: It is possible Petitioners might want to ask some questions of Dr Maynard.

  588. MS LIEVEN: My Lord, I am entirely in the Committee's—and, indeed, Newham's -hands as to whether they want to ask Dr Maynard questions now or would rather have that opportunity later in the day when we have heard the Newham evidence.

  589. CHAIRMAN: This was going to be a general presentation and it has been. I believe that specific points may arise this afternoon, on which I do not wish to forestall questions at this stage, but when we have heard the Petitioners it might be that they want to ask Dr Maynard something, and so may we. Therefore, it would be very convenient if she could stay.

  590. MS LIEVEN: Certainly, my Lord, I will check that with her over the short break.

  591. CHAIRMAN: We will have a short break. Shall we come back at half-past eleven? Very well; adjourned until then.

After a short break

  592. CHAIRMAN: I think we will now resume. I am reliably told that there will be tea and coffee in the upper waiting room tomorrow; unfortunately things broke down today but it will be put right. Mr Wills, did you want to ask some questions of Dr Maynard now or do you want to do it later?

  593. MS LIEVEN: I think it is Mr Reed, my Lord.

  594. MR REED: Mr Reed, my Lord and I represent Newham Borough Council. I do have some generic questions at the moment on some matters relating to the criteria that were applied. I simply want to understand with Dr Maynard the extent to which she has had any involvement in those matters.

  595. CHAIRMAN: I do not see any reason why you should not ask generic questions. Dr Maynard is going to stay this afternoon, and if they are to do particularly with the stations you are concerned with, she can answer then too. Go ahead on the generic points.

Cross-examined by MR REED

  596. MR REED: Dr Maynard, can I first of all understand with you the role that you have had in Crossrail, please? Am I right that you are the policy adviser to Crossrail on accessibility issues for the disability and mobility impaired?

  (Dr Maynard) No.

  597. What is your role?
  (Dr Maynard) I am policy adviser to Crossrail on inclusivity issues so I am policy adviser particularly in relation to the inclusion policy. What I am very specifically not is an access consultant, and there is quite a blurred boundary between the two because obviously accessibility issues are very important to inclusion and therefore I am very particularly interested in them but, on the other hand, there are some very technical aspects of accessibility about which I do not advise Crossrail and that is the job of David Bonnett Associates.

  598. I see. Am I right that you do however advise them on the policy to be applied in respect of inclusivity generally?
  (Dr Maynard) Yes.

  599. In that regard do you know about Government policy on those matters?

   (Dr Maynard) Yes.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008