Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 7760 - 7779)

  7760. Notwithstanding this continuing disagreement between the Promoter and the London Borough of Camden regarding the appropriate design noise criterion to adopt, the content of IPD10 is now agreed and, given that, there is no need for the Committee to resolve the issue between the parties. If, however, the Committee feels that it has to resolve that issue, we would ask the Committee to decide now whether it wants to take that course because, if it does, the Promoter will wish to call further evidence from Mr Thornely-Taylor to assist you in your deliberations, so we would ask you please, if you would be kind enough, to decide now whether you wish to determine the issue about 35 or 40dB, and we say you do not need to, but, if you do, we will call evidence before you.

  7761. CHAIRMAN: You are not going to get an answer now. We have been presented with these two papers this morning and we have not had the smallest opportunity to consider them. To suggest that we could decide upon it now is, I am afraid, just not feasible.

  7762. MR TAYLOR: In that case, we will need to call the evidence.

  7763. CHAIRMAN: Today?

  7764. MR TAYLOR: Yes.

  7765. CHAIRMAN: Mr Clarkson, apart from that, does what you have just heard blow your statement out of the water?

  7766. MR CLARKSON: No, my Lord, the statement contains the issue, declares the issue. We say that, although we disagree with it, we leave the 40 as it is, we challenge it because we say we get there in any event pragmatically. I have to make it plain that, if Mr Taylor is going to call evidence, I will challenge that evidence and I will seek leave to call Mr Methold to give his evidence.

  7767. CHAIRMAN: And the statement that you have made is on behalf, generically, of all the London borough councils that you have mentioned?

  7768. MR CLARKSON: It is, my Lord, those declared in paragraph 1.

  7769. CHAIRMAN: I just want to take this opportunity of saying, as I did not have a chance to do it before, that the Committee is extremely grateful to those London borough councils which have dealt with generic issues. It has saved an enormous amount of time and, on some of these issues, a lot of very complicated evidence. We are really grateful to Camden for dealing with this matter.

  7770. MR CLARKSON: I will pass that back, my Lord.

  7771. CHAIRMAN: And Tower Hamlets are in agreement?

  7772. MR CLARKSON: Tower Hamlets are in agreement.

  7773. CHAIRMAN: Well, we had better discuss the proposition that you call a lot of evidence and, if that has to happen, it has to happen, so I wonder if you would be kind enough to leave us now for the moment.

At 10.30am Counsel and Parties are directed to withdraw and at 10.39am are again called in

  7774. CHAIRMAN: We do not think that it is going to be necessary to call evidence on this matter. What we propose to do is to print the two rival statements as an appendix to our Report and we will have to see what happens, but I do not think we are going to be advantaged by hearing evidence on this matter again today, so thank you to the experts.

  7775. MR TAYLOR: My Lord, thank you for that indication and sorry to have bounced you into that.

  7776. CHAIRMAN: Mr Clarkson, thank you very much and thank you to the London Borough of Camden, as I said.

  7777. MS LIEVEN: My Lords, the next Petitioner are the Trustees of St Barnabas. There have been extensive negotiations in the corridor, and I hope your Lordships might not feel I was being cheeky if I suggested that perhaps we could take a slightly earlier coffee break.

The Petition of David Monro and Adam Scott—The House of St Barnabas-in-Soho

  7778. CHAIRMAN: There is not usually any coffee!

  7779. MS LIEVEN: We could go on with St Barnabas and just stop for five minutes while everybody rearranges themselves. I also understand that St Barnabas have been told that they would not start before 11 because one of their trustees, I think it is, is coming from Paris or Brussels this morning and was told that he did not need to be here before 11, so some kind of short break might be required.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008