Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 7780 - 7799)

  7780. CHAIRMAN: So we cannot do it anyway?

  7781. MS LIEVEN: Well, it might be better to stop for a few minutes.

  7782. CHAIRMAN: Is there evidence that we could spend our time reading?

  7783. MS LIEVEN: I am told by Mr Mould that he is happy to start now, my Lord, so perhaps we will just plunge on with it.

  7784. CHAIRMAN: Can I just explain to the Petitioners the system that we have been adopting. Technically, you start, but it has been found to be convenient if the Promoters say a word in advance factually to describe what the situation is. We will not go any further than that until your team is complete, but I think that might usefully put us in the picture. Very well, Mr Mould.

The following Petition against the Bill was read:

The Petition of the Trustees of The House of St Barnabas-in-Soho.

THE REVEREND ADAM SCOTT and DAVID MONRO appeared on behalf of the Petitioners.

Jeremy Pickering appeared as Agent.

  7785. MR MOULD: My Lord, the next Petitioners are the Trustees of The House of St Barnabas-in-Soho. I have put up a plan just to show you and we have shaded in purple the Petitioners' premises and outlined the actual area of the property in red.[1] This is Soho Square (indicating) and this street, as you will be very familiar with, is Greek Street, and I would also draw attention to Manette Street here (indicating). Now, the grey shading that you see in the vicinity of Soho Square and just to the west of Tottenham Court Road shows the broad outline of the Crossrail Tottenham Court Road Station and, as you can see, the westbound running tunnel as it passes into the Tottenham Court Road Crossrail Station is situated in part in subsoil beneath the Petitioner's premises and will be constructed as such.

The Petition of David Monro and Adam Scott—The House of St Barnabas-in-Soho

  7786. CHAIRMAN: That running tunnel must go further to the east, but it has not been shaded.

  7787. MR MOULD: That is right, yes. Mr Berryman quite rightly corrects me, I am being slightly imprecise about it. It is a platform tunnel and of course the running tunnel runs to the east. The Petitioner's property comprises two very valuable historic buildings 1 Greek Street which is situated at the south-eastern corner of Soho Square, and the Chapel which is situated on the northern side of Manette Street. The first of those buildings is a very fine Georgian town house and the second of them is a Victorian religious building with associations with the Oxford Movement. Both of them, reflecting their high value both historically and architecturally, are listed in the statutory list at Grade I, and the Petitioners, as I understand it, and they will explain this in due course, are entrusted with the ownership, preservation and use of those buildings for charitable purposes.

  7788. As regards the impact or potential impact of the scheme upon those buildings, plainly your Lordships will recognise that first and foremost in terms of consideration is the question of ground settlement. As your Lordships will recall, we have an established process for assessing ground settlement which is in progress and has reached a certain stage. In relation to these buildings, we have reached the Phase Three, Stage One stage and we have included in your packs, and I have shown the first page on the screen, the assessment report in relation to the Petitioners' buildings.[2]

  7789. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: Can I just go back to the map of Soho Square.[3] Last week we heard the Petition of Mr Pritchett about blocks of flats that were being pulled down. Could you point out precisely where they are because we also will be dealing with dust later, will we not, arising from demolition?

  7790. MR MOULD: I am not sure that that is going to feature as a specific issue for your Lordships. I know it is in the Petition, but I do not think it is part of the particular concerns which the Petitioners are going to raise, and I will be corrected if I am wrong on that. The location of Mr Pritchett's premises is not shown on this plan. It is to the west, just off Dean Street. My geography of Soho is not entirely specific, but I seem to recall that it goes Greek Street, Frith Street, Dean Street and I think Ronnie Scott's is on Frith Street! As you will recall, it is the western ticket hall that is the source of Mr Pritchett being displaced and this is closer to the east.

  7791. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: Mr Mould, I think Ronnie Scott's is on Wardour Street!

  7792. MR MOULD: It is an article of faith that one never disagrees with a member of the Committee, but I believe it is on Frith Street—

  7793. LORD JAMES OF BLACKHEATH: Are you of a gambling disposition?

  7794. MR MOULD:—but I will not ask your Lordships to rule on that! If we can return to the assessment report, we have included this in your packs, but suffice to say that at this stage in the assessment process these buildings are assessed to experience a moderate risk of settlement damage from the works and the degree of sensitivity internally and externally of these buildings, having regard to their historic and architectural features—and I am putting up the relevant page just to show you the familiar table.[4] Yes, at the bottom of the page you can see that we have set out the classification of damage table here and you can see that the maximum tensile strain predicted for this building is 0.283 per cent and that fits in towards the upper end of the moderate category of risk of damage, that is to say, category 3. So this is a building which, not only as regards its sensitive and important historical and architectural characteristics, but also as regards the risk classification that we have applied to it, will require very careful further consideration at appraisal.

  7795. CHAIRMAN: That would include the interior?

  7796. MR MOULD: That would include the interior and that will be dealt with at the next stage of the process, the second stage of phase three, and hereafter the programme is that the works should be undertaken here in about late 2011/2012, a very detailed process of appraisal, the identification of appropriate protective and preventative measures both underground and also outside the building itself which will need to be considered and set in place. The one thing I want to make very clear at the outset is that we, for our part, are committed that that process should be undertaken closely in association with the Petitioners and their expert advisers and the agreement that we are negotiating with them at the moment should provide for that, as well of course as the input of English Heritage and of the local planning authority, Westminster City Council, who, as your Lordships know, have important roles in terms of ensuring that any preventative or remedial works that are undertaken to buildings of this kind are entirely appropriate and sensitive to their existing historic character.

  7797. Those matters, as far as we are concerned, are all given. They are provided for under the settlement process and the Settlement Deed that we have referred you to in the past, but in this case also we are in the process of negotiating a bespoke agreement with the Petitioners and that will make certain additional provisions, for example, as regards us meeting the reasonable costs of a number of experts whom the Petitioners would wish to have instructed to participate fully in the process of appraising and providing for the public protection and remediation of this building from any effects resulting from the Crossrail scheme.

  7798. CHAIRMAN: So it will be a super-Settlement Deed?

  7799. MR MOULD: Indeed so, in that sense, yes. In that way, it is, I hope I can say fairly, the joint expectation and intention of both ourselves and the Petitioners that the potential risk, which I have referred you to which of course relates to unmitigated settlement with appropriate mitigation both before, during and after the works have been undertaken, as is required in order to keep the building safe, that that risk will not stand any chance of eventuating. That is all I want to say at this stage about ground settlement.



1   Crossrail Ref: P53, Petitioners' property and the The House of St Barnabas-in-Soho-Plan (WESTCC-36_04-001) Back

2   Crossrail Ref: P53, House of St. Barnanbas, 1 Greek Street-Historic Building & Features-Phase 3 Stage 1 Iteration Reports (WESTCC-36_05-001) Back

3   Crossrail Ref: P53, Petitioners' property and the The House of St Barnabas-in-Soho-Plan (WESTCC-36_04-001) Back

4   Crossrail Ref: P53, 1 Greek Street-General Description-Phase 3 Stage 1 Iteration Reports (WESTCC-36_05-008) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008