Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 11920 - 11939)

  11920. CHAIRMAN: I am sure you have.

  11921. MS KHELA: Mr Elvin has had ample time to investigate—

  11922. MR ELVIN: If Ms Khela had read the transcripts of the Spitalfields week she will have seen that in relation to liaison we were content to have the same structure as the King's Cross Liaison Panel.

  11923. MS KHELA: But I—

  11924. MR ELVIN: Please let me finish.

  11925. MS KHELA: I am sorry.

  11926. MR ELVIN: As you know, we have given an undertaking to the House of Commons to act as a facilitator as far as we can and as far as the community will allow us to set up a Liaison Panel. We are not going to run it. Your Lordships are familiar with what happened in the two weeks before Easter. We have already said we are content, if that is what the community wants, to have the King's Cross tripartite model. I think I put before the Committee, and I think my Lord, Lord Snape recalls this, the material from Camden, the correspondence, so Ms Khela is pushing at an open door if she wants that because I have already said we do not dispute that is an appropriate model if that is what the community wants.

  11927. CHAIRMAN: I am sure we will be perfectly happy as a Select Committee if that happened as well.

  11928. MS KHELA: On that basis, Crossrail will undertake then to direct the nominated contractor to submit all section 61 and Schedule 7 applications with supporting documents to the Spitalfields and Whitechapel Community Liaison Panel six weeks prior to the submission to the London—

  11929. CHAIRMAN: Now you are quoting from something else, are you?

  11930. MS KHELA: No, this is the undertaking we want on the basis of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link St Pancras Station Camden Council Report in December 2006 which outlines that consultees are affected groups and not the kind of arbitrary definition of—

  11931. CHAIRMAN: Mr Elvin, is that part of the undertaking or not?

  11932. MR ELVIN: No.

  11933. MS KHELA: No. We would like that.

  11934. LORD SNAPE: Lord Chairman, I hesitate to interrupt but there are some points I would like to raise with you. First of all, this matter was discussed in some detail and I cross-examined Mr Elvin personally about the King's Cross forum and indeed received some undertakings from him that procedures which would be followed as far as Spitalfields was concerned would be identical to those which were followed at the time of the King's Cross forum.

  11935. MS KHELA: May I read—

  11936. LORD SNAPE: I have not finished yet. The second point I wish to raise is a time one. You did say to this witness an hour and a half ago that this Committee was time-limited to 7.30 and I do think it is important we hear from the Promoters at some stage before 7.30. The third point is that I do think it is time that you actually enforced your rulings rather than giving advice to this particular petitioner.

  11937. CHAIRMAN: You see, Ms Khela, I am trying to give you such latitude as I possibly can. The fact of the matter is, it is extremely difficult to follow what you are saying, because we do not seem to have the documents or we did not have the documents before. If you want undertakings, the normal method of getting undertakings is to start negotiations with the Promoters and see if you can reach agreement, and I can tell you that lots and lots of other petitioners have done that very successfully.

  11938. MS KHELA: They do not tend to be—

  11939. CHAIRMAN: There is a huge register of them. You have not done it, have you?



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008